<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Testing IT by uncle MAT &#187; quality center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/tag/quality-center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Avec des bon gros morceaux de retour d'expériences !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 14:24:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>fr</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='testingitbymat.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

			<item>
		<title>How to make unit test?</title>
		<link>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/05/18/how-to-make-unit-test/</link>
		<comments>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/05/18/how-to-make-unit-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 13:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madspock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Test delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bugzilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checkstyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cobertura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cvs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javadoc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Junit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mantis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selenium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing good practrice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The unit test :
Definition:
“Test Unit (TU) (development test): A unit test is a test conducted by the developer in development environment; it is intended to demonstrate a unit complies with the criteria defined in the technical specifications.”
In the case of a procedural language unit is &#8220;the process&#8221;, and in the case of an object-oriented unit [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=testingitbymat.wordpress.com&blog=5001187&post=197&subd=testingitbymat&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/05/18/how-to-make-unit-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c25edb8d969f0311b28313c3e5d56e44?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">madspock</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comment mettre en oeuvre des tests unitaires ?</title>
		<link>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/05/18/comment-mettre-en-oeuvre-des-tests-unitaires/</link>
		<comments>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/05/18/comment-mettre-en-oeuvre-des-tests-unitaires/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 13:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madspock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tests technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonne pratique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bugzilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checkstyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cobertura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVS subversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intégration continue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javadoc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Junit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mantis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selenium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test unitaire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Définition :
« Test Unitaire (TU) (ou test de développement) : un test unitaire est un test mené par le développeur en environnement de développement, il a pour but de démontrer qu’une unité respecte bien les critères définis dans les spécifications techniques ».

Dans le cas d’un langage procédural l’unité est « la procédure », et dans le cas d’un contexte orienté objet [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=testingitbymat.wordpress.com&blog=5001187&post=191&subd=testingitbymat&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/05/18/comment-mettre-en-oeuvre-des-tests-unitaires/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c25edb8d969f0311b28313c3e5d56e44?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">madspock</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preview: new versions of Quality Center and QuickTest Pro V 10.00!</title>
		<link>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/preview-new-versions-of-quality-center-and-quicktest-pro-v-1000/</link>
		<comments>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/preview-new-versions-of-quality-center-and-quicktest-pro-v-1000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madspock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing tools and Automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP Mercury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qtp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality c]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quicktest pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I attended the presentations of new versions of Quality Center (QC) and QuickTest Pro (QTP) in the version 10.00. This HP in Issy les Moulineaux (Near to Paris &#8211; France) a rainy morning. And so, in the TGV (a very fast railway for the English) brings me back, I type this article to share with [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=testingitbymat.wordpress.com&blog=5001187&post=149&subd=testingitbymat&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/preview-new-versions-of-quality-center-and-quicktest-pro-v-1000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c25edb8d969f0311b28313c3e5d56e44?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">madspock</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criteria for selecting a management testing tool (or quality management tool)</title>
		<link>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/criteria-for-selecting-a-management-testing-tool-or-quality-management-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/criteria-for-selecting-a-management-testing-tool-or-quality-management-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madspock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing tools and Automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entreprise architect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testlink]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/criteria-for-selecting-a-management-testing-tool-or-quality-management-tool/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Criteria for selecting a management testing tool (or quality management tool):
This article will help you to choose a management testing tool in peace. Why? Because for some client it’s not easy as we can believe. Example: a client already has a tool from HP (Quality Center) and at the same time using Enterprise Architect (EA) [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=testingitbymat.wordpress.com&blog=5001187&post=148&subd=testingitbymat&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/criteria-for-selecting-a-management-testing-tool-or-quality-management-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c25edb8d969f0311b28313c3e5d56e44?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">madspock</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critères de choix d’un outil de référentiel de tests</title>
		<link>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/criteres-de-choix-d%e2%80%99un-outil-de-referentiel-de-tests/</link>
		<comments>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/criteres-de-choix-d%e2%80%99un-outil-de-referentiel-de-tests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madspock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outils & Automates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entreprise architect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outil de test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[référentiel de test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cet article doit pouvoir vous aider pour choisir un outil de référentiel de tests dans la sérénité. Pourquoi ? Car chez certain client les choses ne sont pas aussi facile que l&#8217;on peux le croire. Exemple : un client possède déjà un outil de chez HP (QC) et en même temps utilise Entreprise Architect (EA) [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=testingitbymat.wordpress.com&blog=5001187&post=146&subd=testingitbymat&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/criteres-de-choix-d%e2%80%99un-outil-de-referentiel-de-tests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c25edb8d969f0311b28313c3e5d56e44?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">madspock</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>En avant-première : nouvelles versions de Quality Center et Quicktest Pro en V 10.00 !</title>
		<link>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/en-avant-premiere-nouvelles-version-de-quality-center-et-quicktest-pro-en-v-1000/</link>
		<comments>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/en-avant-premiere-nouvelles-version-de-quality-center-et-quicktest-pro-en-v-1000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madspock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outils & Automates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10.00]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9.2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatisation test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exigence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fonctional testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gestion configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gestion version]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercury Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quicktest pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[script test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[versionning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J’ai assisté aux présentations des nouvelles versions de Quality Center (QC) et Quicktest Pro (QTP) dans leur version 10.00. Ceci chez HP à Issy les Moulineaux par un matin pluvieux. Et ainsi, dans le TGV qui me ramène, je tape cet article pour partager avec vous les informations données par HP dans leur sous-sol…
Le programme [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=testingitbymat.wordpress.com&blog=5001187&post=130&subd=testingitbymat&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/en-avant-premiere-nouvelles-version-de-quality-center-et-quicktest-pro-en-v-1000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c25edb8d969f0311b28313c3e5d56e44?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">madspock</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best practices and test repository</title>
		<link>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2008/10/22/best-practices-and-test-repository/</link>
		<comments>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2008/10/22/best-practices-and-test-repository/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madspock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles en version anglaise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test repository]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say Uncle, you can give me some best practices pleaaaaaaaaaaase? 
The first good practices are:
- Good sense
- Organization,
- Reflections.
Nothing but magic, properly implemented, will guarantee the proper use of a benchmark test. I will expose them as a question to ask the good moments:
Management requirements or requirements:
- Uniqueness?
o This is the only item on this [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=testingitbymat.wordpress.com&blog=5001187&post=91&subd=testingitbymat&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2008/10/22/best-practices-and-test-repository/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c25edb8d969f0311b28313c3e5d56e44?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">madspock</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bonnes pratiques des référentiels de test</title>
		<link>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/bonnes-pratiques-des-referentiels-de-test/</link>
		<comments>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/bonnes-pratiques-des-referentiels-de-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madspock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outils & Automates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anomalie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonne pratique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonne utilisation de hp quality center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criticité]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exigence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiche de test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gravité]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plan de test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[référentiel de test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selenium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test plan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dis tonton, tu peux me donner quelques best practices steuplé ?
Les premières bonnes pratiques sont :

 Bon sens,
 Organisation,
 Réflexions.

Rien de magiques mais qui, bien appliquées, seront les garants de la bonne utilisation d’un référentiel de test. Je vais les exposer sous forme de question à se poser aux bons moments :
Gestion des exigences ou [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=testingitbymat.wordpress.com&blog=5001187&post=56&subd=testingitbymat&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/bonnes-pratiques-des-referentiels-de-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c25edb8d969f0311b28313c3e5d56e44?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">madspock</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manuel de survie sur Quality Center !</title>
		<link>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/manuel-de-survie-sur-quality-center-des-testeurs-et-teuses/</link>
		<comments>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/manuel-de-survie-sur-quality-center-des-testeurs-et-teuses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madspock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Outils & Automates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anomalie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonne pratique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonne utilisation de hp quality center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[référentiel de test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selenium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dans le monde du test tout le monde parle de Quality Center (QC pour son petit nom) de l’éditeur HP Mercury. Tout le monde en parle, du client à la société de service, en passant par les ingénieurs qui ne jurent que par ce fabuleux QC… Quel monde merveilleux que le notre dans lequel tout [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=testingitbymat.wordpress.com&blog=5001187&post=51&subd=testingitbymat&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://testingitbymat.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/manuel-de-survie-sur-quality-center-des-testeurs-et-teuses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c25edb8d969f0311b28313c3e5d56e44?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">madspock</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>